Like the rest of Chanel’s Spring 2010 collection, the bags we saw their jobs (barnway?) Goods for more than a rustic-elegant Parisian classic. If that’s your thing or not, Karl Lagerfeld, it certainly seems to believe.

The problem with Chanel, is that good or bad, they are much more aesthetic look to history when a new collection is designed and built, and usually decides Lagerfeld, see the story. What that means is usually not innovative Chanel. They do something different here and there, and many of their bags are very nice, but we seldom see them start new bag trends.

I am not sure whether a positive or negative – it just kind. If you would like their aesthetic, then I’m sure you do well with what they do and how they do it. If you do not, there are many alternatives to spend your money. There are a few unexpected things in these accessories, but usually it’s just the same bags we have a slightly frayed edges. I can understand fully, if that is what they want to send to retailers, but I can not help myself but want Lagerfeld & Co. would embrace the fantasy of the trail a little more in the accessories department.